No
Trial of Tasar II
A message from Frank Bethwaite, reprinted
from the TasarSailors list, December 6, 2002.
"They are pleasant and well organised people, and the boat
they
sail is interesting. Why don't we do as they suggest; try sailing
with
them for a year in a used boat and see how it goes?"
For this to be able to happen, somebody had to think ten years
ahead ten years ago. For the past forty odd years, I have been one
of those people.
In 1960, we nailed the credo high - "Most fun - for men and
women". By 1969, the NS14 class near a thousand strong enjoyed
exactly the man and woman social and sailing pleasure with a cutting
edge boat that we all still value.
In 1970, the threat from a weight-sensitive design was lethal to
mature women. It was Bob Hammond who asked "Frank, can we use
technology to preserve what we value?" I did the sums, and
came up with the Nova, an updated NS14. The boat that you love so
much today is an update which was given to you by the four giants
who stood by me to get it started - Bob and Cath Hammond, Phillip
and Janet Rowe, Michael Goldrick (Colin's father), and my wife Nel.
By 1980 the Nova had become the Tasar and Phillip was the president
over the Sydney worlds with 122 boats and the presentation in the
Sydney Opera House.
The next ten years are Keiji Yoshikawa's. It was in fact seven
years from his initial letter to me to the first Japanese World's
at Hayama. Amazing foresight and brilliant organisation. The '90's
decade was a time of sea change for the whole of the sailing community
as the apparent wind revolution started by the exotic skiffs of
Sydney became mainstream with the selection of the skiff-derived
49er as the pinnacle Olympic high performance boat, the spread of
the 29er youth trainer world-wide, and a mass of quickie me-too
fraudulent copies which don't deliver. I think I deserve a brownie
point for defending the Tasar class against fraud.
Throughout my years with the NS14, the Nova and the Tasar classes
I have
admired and enjoyed the maturity and the generosity of spirit of
the
membership, and their ability to see each others' point of view
and reach
a logical decision respected by all even when not agreed with by
some. I
have been confident that if I put ideas to the class they would
be debated
fairly, and both the class and I would be comfortable with the outcome.
The B-14 inspired spinnaker proposal about 1990 was fairly debated,
but it
quickly became clear that those not then in favour far outnumbered
those in
favour, so I withdrew it, with the suggestion that it be adjourned
for
ten years. Ten years later was a different story, I was asked by
the
class to go ahead with a spinnaker trial, and the technical result
- it
did not work well - surprised all of us. Again, nothing but generosity
of spirit.
Which brings me to 2003, and my dreaming of who will utter the
opening sentence above in 2013, and to whom? The threat to the Tasar
class of zero demand for whatever reason is lethal. The update route
worked in the past, and the update route with parallel operation
is my best suggestion, so I have put this proposal up for debate
by the class.
The numbers from the two straw ballots are about equal. I count
9 yes and 11 no on this forum. Richard Spencer reports 9 yes and
9 no on the web page. On this basis of near 50% approval a trial
would certainly appear to be justified.
But on this occasion I have been dismayed and enormously disappointed
that for the first time generosity of spirit has been withdrawn,
to the point where the moderator has felt it necessary to call for
order.
What I read from this is that the class is not yet ready for this
debate. It is certainly not ready for any trial, whatever may be
the numbers in favour or against. And it will help if I remove myself
as a target. I withdraw my offer to conduct a trial.
This will transfer responsibility for initiating any change to
the class. I am not "going home" as Geoffrey fears. I
will be happy to answer whatever questions are put to me.
Sincerely, Frank Bethwaite
Posted 2002-12-19 |